Value of a Non-Royal King (Answered)

One of the most critical pieces in chess is the king. The capture of the king signifies the end of the game.

But what if there was a piece that moved like a king but didn’t result in checkmate if lost?

We look into the hypothetical value of a non-royal king.

The short answer of the value of a non-royal king:

The value of a non-royal king is likely between that of a pawn and a knight or bishop or roughly equal to that of a knight or bishop. It moves in a versatile way. But the non-royal king has limited range. This limits its power relative to a rook or queen.

The Traditional Role of the King

The king moves one square in any direction: horizontally, vertically, or diagonally.

While its movement is limited compared to other pieces, its value is unparalleled.

The primary objective in chess is to checkmate the opponent’s king, rendering it unable to move without being captured.

The Hypothetical Non-Royal King

Imagine a piece that moves exactly like the king but doesn’t hold the royal status.

This means that its capture wouldn’t result in an immediate loss.

It would be a piece that offers strategic movement without the game-ending implications.

Such a piece might exist in a chess variant where the objective is to simply eliminate all of the other player’s pieces rather than checkmate the king.

Potential Value in Gameplay of the Non-Royal King

The potential value of a non-royal king:

Defensive Play

This piece could act as a shield for the actual king or other valuable pieces, confusing the opponent or forcing them to waste moves.

Offensive Play

Without the fear of checkmate upon its capture, this piece could be used more aggressively, venturing into enemy territory without significant repercussions.

Diversifying Strategy

Introducing such a piece would add another layer of complexity to the game, requiring players to rethink traditional strategies and come up with innovative tactics.

Compared to Existing Pieces

To gauge the value of this hypothetical piece, it’s essential to compare it to existing chess pieces:


The non-royal king would undoubtedly be more valuable than a pawn due to its versatile movement.

Knight and Bishop

While these pieces have unique movement capabilities, the non-royal king’s ability to move in any direction might place its value somewhere close to or slightly below them.

The versatile movement of the non-royal king would compensate for its lack of range.

Rook and Queen

Given their range and power, the rook and queen would likely still hold higher value than the non-royal king.

Potential Challenges in a Non-Royal King Form of Chess

Some challenges in a chess variant involving a non-royal king:

Increased Game Duration

With another piece on the board that doesn’t result in immediate loss upon capture, games might become longer.

As stated above, such a chess variant might involve eliminating all of the pieces rather than just the king.

Learning Curve

Traditional chess players would need time to adapt to the new strategies this piece would introduce.

FAQs – Value of a Non-Royal King

What is the traditional role of the King in chess?

The King is the most vital piece in a game of chess.

The primary objective of the game is to checkmate the opponent’s King, which means putting it in a position where it cannot escape capture.

If a player’s King is checkmated, that player loses the game.

How would this new piece differ from the traditional King?

This new piece would move exactly like the King, meaning it can move one square in any direction: horizontally, vertically, or diagonally.

However, unlike the traditional King, the loss of this piece would not result in checkmate or the end of the game.

What might be the approximate value of this new chess piece in comparison to other pieces?

While the exact value can vary based on the specific game situation, this new piece would likely have a value somewhere between a pawn and a minor piece (Bishop or Knight).

Since its loss doesn’t result in checkmate, it wouldn’t have the infinite value of a King.

However, given its versatile movement, it might be valued slightly higher than a pawn but less than a Rook or Queen.

How would the introduction of this piece affect gameplay strategies?

Introducing this piece would add a new layer of complexity to the game.

Players would need to consider the strategic value of this piece in both offense and defense.

It could serve as a powerful tool for controlling key squares without the risk associated with the King.

Players would need to weigh the benefits of using it aggressively versus conservatively.

Would this piece be vulnerable to checks and pins like the traditional King?

Yes, this piece would still be vulnerable to checks and pins due to its movement pattern.

However, unlike the traditional King, being in check wouldn’t be as critical since its capture wouldn’t result in checkmate.

Players would still need to be cautious but would have more flexibility in how they respond to threats against this piece.

How would this piece interact with the concept of stalemate?

Since the loss of this piece doesn’t result in checkmate, it wouldn’t directly impact the concept of stalemate.

However, its presence on the board could influence stalemate situations, especially if it’s one of the few remaining pieces.

Could this piece be promoted if it reaches the opponent’s back rank?

Traditionally, only pawns can be promoted upon reaching the opponent’s back rank.

If this new piece were to adopt similar rules, then it wouldn’t be eligible for promotion.

However, the introduction of this piece could come with its own set of rules, and promotion could be one of the considerations.

How would this piece affect the opening, middle, and endgame phases?

In the opening, this piece could be used to control central squares or support other pieces without the immediate risk associated with the King.

In the middle game, it might play a pivotal role in attacking or defending key positions or squares.

In the endgame, its value could increase, especially in situations where both players have fewer pieces, making its versatile movement more influential.

Are there historical or variant chess games that have introduced similar pieces?

There are many chess variants with different pieces and rules.

Some, like Capablanca Chess, introduce new pieces with unique movements.

However, a piece that moves like a King without the checkmate consequence is relatively unique and would offer a fresh perspective on traditional chess strategies.

How can players practice and adapt to this new piece?

Players can practice by incorporating this piece into friendly games or using chess software that allows for custom pieces.

Studying its influence in various positions and understanding its strengths and weaknesses will be key to mastering strategies involving this piece.


The introduction of a non-royal king in chess is a fascinating concept.

Its value would likely lie somewhere between a pawn and a rook, offering players a unique strategic tool without the game-ending implications of the traditional king.

While it’s uncertain if such a piece will ever make its way to the chessboard, it’s always intriguing to ponder the endless possibilities of this timeless game.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *